|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- $6.6 billion dollars of
new construction and
major renovation
- An overall
environmental initiative
- Civil and infrastructure
- Runways
- Occupied buildings
- Unoccupied buildings
|
|
3
|
- $6.6 billion dollars of
new construction and
major renovation
- An overall
environmental initiative
- Civil and infrastructure
- Runways
- Occupied buildings
- Unoccupied buildings
|
|
4
|
- Political
- Managerial
- Tenants
- Users
|
|
5
|
- Governors
- County Boards
- City Councils
- Airport
Commissions
- Mayors
|
|
6
|
- Airport Director
- Airport Chief Financial Officer
- Environmental Compliance Director
- Planning and Design Directors
- Facility Maintenance Director
- Operations Director
|
|
7
|
- Airlines
- Concessionnaires
- Rental Car Companies
- Shuttle Bus Service Providers
- Airport Employees
|
|
8
|
- The positive image of environmental
stewardship – it’s a political win-win
- Implementing energy efficiencies creates jobs
- A nationalistic image – its reduces dependence
on foreign oil
- It’s the “right” thing to do
- It saves money - reducing O&M and shrinking city, county and airport
budgets – a favorite among taxpayers
|
|
9
|
- It saves money! – Reducing O&M budgets that can directly reduce
landing fees and rent for airlines
- Reducing O&M is key since it cannot be amortized over many years
like capital expenses
- Saves tenants money directly in their own metered energy costs
|
|
10
|
- Aids significantly to environmental approval of projects
- Energy efficient and non-polluting strategies can be used to offset
project impacts
- Quicker approval of environmental issues saves time, and therefore
money in implementing projects
|
|
11
|
- Makes operations more simple and reduces O&M labor
- Can be financed with no up front capital costs
- Provides a positive image for the airport and the airlines
|
|
12
|
- Early commitment - in the 1990’s Mayor Daley championed “Green”
sustainable projects in the City
- Before it became airport “policy” consultants and airport planning /
design staff implemented sustainable goals for the T-6 project in1999.
- LEED standards were used but modified to include specific airport
issues
- An analysis examined the cost and return on investment for this fixed
cost project
|
|
13
|
- Conclusions on the best to least energy efficiency strategies based on
return on investment:
- Lighting controls
- Building automation controls
- Daylighting
- Water saving plumbing fixtures
- High efficiency glazing
- High efficient HVAC equipment
(variable volume pumps)
|
|
14
|
- Conclusions on the most effective reduction in air emissions
- Point of use 400Hz ground power units
- Point of use pre-conditioned air units
- Electric charging stations for electric GSE vehicles
- Close proximity access to mass
transit station
|
|
15
|
- $6.6 billion in construction
- Ten year implementation period
- Complex design and construction teams
- Variety of project types
- Multiple design packages
|
|
16
|
- Engages existing participants
- Enables new and future participants
- All stake holders can contribute
- For the OMP this included:
- Mayor’s Office
- OMP Staff
- Airline representatives
- City departments including Environment, Water Management, Planning
& Development, General Services
- Professionals including planners, designers, engineers, architects,
construction managers, etc
|
|
17
|
- Define the stakeholders
- Political
- Managerial
- Design
- Construction
- Tenant
- Tap the creativity of the team
- Workshop methodology
|
|
18
|
- Framework for sustainability
- Sustainable Sites
- Water Efficiency
- Energy & Atmosphere
- Materials & Resources
- Indoor Environmental Quality
- O’Hare Facility Operations
- Intertask Resource Coordination
- Construction Practices
|
|
19
|
- Project types
and opportunities
- Civil – airside
- Civil – landside
- Occupied buildings
- Unoccupied buildings
- Background presentations
- Define the “sandbox”
- Brainstorming
|
|
20
|
- Vision Statement
- O’Hare International Airport will continue to evolve as a benchmark
for environmental stewardship in design and construction. The O’Hare
Modernization Program will embrace the best possible environmental,
social and fiscally responsible practices to enhance the quality of
life and maintain consistency with the overall mission and goals of the
City of Chicago.
|
|
21
|
- Remember, this will have a life of its own
|
|
22
|
- Organize for input
- Intent
- Recommendations
- Technology/Strategy
- Current Practice
- Design Recommendations
- Design Guidelines
- Draft, revise, redraft – get input
|
|
23
|
- Develop a comprehensive plan
- Different stakeholders have different motivations
- Find the synergies
|
|
24
|
- Establish guidelines and standards, not mandates
- Identify categories
and issues
- Design tool
- Management
evaluation
|
|
25
|
- Design tool
- Management evaluation
|
|
26
|
- Can a broad environmental design approach support airport energy goals?
- Can value be realized through environmental design ?
- What are the merits of pursuing environmental design ?
- Develop an integrated approach
- Different stakeholders have different motivations
- Find the synergies
- Find a champion
- Be inclusive
- Develop the goals
|